Alternative Contractual Models of Dredging Projects to Avoid Disputes (A Case Study of the Special Port in Kotabaru)

Yuliana, Candra and Japril, Japril and RADAM, IPHAN FITRIAN (2015) Alternative Contractual Models of Dredging Projects to Avoid Disputes (A Case Study of the Special Port in Kotabaru). The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES), 4 (4). pp. 5-10. ISSN 2319–1805

[img]
Preview
Text
B044205010 (2).pdf

Download (640Kb) | Preview

Abstract

There had been four dredging projects done at the Special Port of PT. Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa Tbk. in Kotabaru, two of which ended in disputes. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the causative factors for disputes and selection of the best contractual model for dredging projects to avoid disputes. The method employed was the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The analysis results in the most significant criteria to avoid disputes in dredging projects, which are technical and quality aspects (43%) and the most significant sub-criteria, which are the factors of fixed designs as well as complete and accurate drawings (75%). The alternative contractual model chosen is the Lump Sum Fixed Price contract (53%), where the importance value given by experts reaches 49%. In so doing, in order that dredging projects do not end in disputes, the best contractual model is the Lump Sum Fixed Price.. Keywords - Analytic Hierarchy Process, Contract, Disputes, Dredging

Item Type: Article
Subjects: T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Teknik > Teknik Sipil
Depositing User: Mr Arief Mirathan
Date Deposited: 09 Sep 2018 08:15
Last Modified: 09 Sep 2018 08:15
URI: http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/id/eprint/4184

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item